Comments on: Released: 3.0 A20 http://www.activeinboxhq.com/blog/2009/09/28/released-3-0-a20/ Thu, 08 Jul 2010 03:48:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: niilo alhovaara http://www.activeinboxhq.com/blog/2009/09/28/released-3-0-a20/comment-page-1/#comment-1277 niilo alhovaara Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:33:19 +0000 http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=166#comment-1277 I've had trouble with pre-labelling for quite a while - wonder if there's a connection to using Gmail offline function through Gears? I’ve had trouble with pre-labelling for quite a while – wonder if there’s a connection to using Gmail offline function through Gears?

]]> By: AndyM http://www.activeinboxhq.com/blog/2009/09/28/released-3-0-a20/comment-page-1/#comment-1276 AndyM Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:23:21 +0000 http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=166#comment-1276 Snooze - I'm going to drop you an email about this, I suspect it's a unique issue. Snooze – I’m going to drop you an email about this, I suspect it’s a unique issue.

]]> By: snooze http://www.activeinboxhq.com/blog/2009/09/28/released-3-0-a20/comment-page-1/#comment-1275 snooze Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:33:55 +0000 http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=166#comment-1275 Extension doesn't install! problems with install.rdf. Previously I installed all the alpha versions of GTD inbox. I tried to install alpha20 because alpha19 doesn't load. Extension doesn’t install! problems with install.rdf. Previously I installed all the alpha versions of GTD inbox. I tried to install alpha20 because alpha19 doesn’t load.

]]> By: AndyM http://www.activeinboxhq.com/blog/2009/09/28/released-3-0-a20/comment-page-1/#comment-1274 AndyM Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:06:20 +0000 http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=166#comment-1274 Hi Vassili, I'll drop you an email and see if we can get this sorted. Hi Vassili, I’ll drop you an email and see if we can get this sorted.

]]> By: Vassili http://www.activeinboxhq.com/blog/2009/09/28/released-3-0-a20/comment-page-1/#comment-1273 Vassili Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:48:45 +0000 http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=166#comment-1273 I just upgraded and I get the following error: GTDInbox is unable to load correctly. Error during gtdMainPagePlugin load: TypeError: label is undefined I just upgraded and I get the following error:

GTDInbox is unable to load correctly.
Error during gtdMainPagePlugin load: TypeError: label is undefined

]]> By: Alan Hart http://www.activeinboxhq.com/blog/2009/09/28/released-3-0-a20/comment-page-1/#comment-1272 Alan Hart Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:13:41 +0000 http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=166#comment-1272 Andy, The new factoring of the Side box from "Quick views" and "Label Categories" down to Reviews with a ToDo overview works. However shouldn't the "Force above Chat" be moved into options? If you hadn't introduced the new factoring I was going to suggest that if a specific status under overview was selected then rather then wasting the left column of the View box telling you that when you look at one status the others are all empty you should let the status label that is being viewed float to the head of the box and allow the sub-sort/filter of projects, context, or contact take up the left panel and allow you to select to open or fold the individual entries to show in the main panel. This would give you one more potential level to sub-sort projects by either context or contact or sub-sort context by project or contact ... I need to play with this some more. As always Thank you and your staff for the effort. You are continuing to delight with the insights your implementation allows. Andy,
The new factoring of the Side box from “Quick views” and “Label Categories” down to Reviews with a
ToDo overview works. However shouldn’t the “Force above Chat” be moved into options?
If you hadn’t introduced the new factoring I was going to suggest that if a specific status under overview was selected then rather then wasting the left column of the View box telling you that when you look at one status the others are all empty you should let the status label that is being viewed float to the head of the box and allow the sub-sort/filter of projects, context, or contact take up the left panel and allow you to select to open or fold the individual entries to show in the main panel. This would give you one more potential level to sub-sort projects by either context or contact or sub-sort context by project or contact …
I need to play with this some more. As always Thank you and your staff for the effort. You are continuing to delight with the insights your implementation allows.

]]> By: Phil Bowman http://www.activeinboxhq.com/blog/2009/09/28/released-3-0-a20/comment-page-1/#comment-1271 Phil Bowman Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:58:34 +0000 http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=166#comment-1271 Yay! It's working with an empty Inbox! :) Yay! It’s working with an empty Inbox! :)

]]> By: Alan Hart http://www.activeinboxhq.com/blog/2009/09/28/released-3-0-a20/comment-page-1/#comment-1270 Alan Hart Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:35:36 +0000 http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=166#comment-1270 Andy, You've been busy! Thank you for also taking the time to announce the forum. And about an A20, lets face it version 3 is developing under sever pressure because of the GMail changes that created the V2 issues. And despite that you aren't compromising the fact that V3 is a complete overhaul with trial concepts and iterative improvements. You could have chosen to freeze V 3 development the moment V 2 had trouble but I believe this product is maturing and becoming ever more useful much faster then if you had split yourself between a stop gap stable V3 and forced all of us core users to wait for V4 to restart the innovation process. So for what it's worth you have my support to keep up Alphas through 99 if need be. It doesn't hurt that you are as responsive as you are some something serious comes up and it is an inherent benefit to your entire structure that even when broken you are still left with useful labels. Please keep charging full speed ahead. Sincerely Alan Andy,
You’ve been busy! Thank you for also taking the time to announce the forum. And about an A20, lets face it version 3 is developing under sever pressure because of the GMail changes that created the V2 issues. And despite that you aren’t compromising the fact that V3 is a complete overhaul with trial concepts and iterative improvements. You could have chosen to freeze V 3 development the moment V 2 had trouble but I believe this product is maturing and becoming ever more useful much faster then if you had split yourself between a stop gap stable V3 and forced all of us core users to wait for V4 to restart the innovation process. So for what it’s worth you have my support to keep up Alphas through 99 if need be. It doesn’t hurt that you are as responsive as you are some something serious comes up and it is an inherent benefit to your entire structure that even when broken you are still left with useful labels. Please keep charging full speed ahead. Sincerely Alan

]]>